Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /home/mysecr27/public_html/wp-content/plugins/enhanced-custom-permalinks.bak/enh-custom-permalinks.php on line 331
social media | My Secret at Heist Blog

Tag: social media

The Ethics of Political Campaigns: A Look into Buying Instagram Followers

The Ethics of Political Campaigns: A Look into Buying Instagram Followers

Politician speaking to the public

In the fast-paced world of political campaigning, candidates are constantly seeking innovative ways to expand their reach and influence. One such strategy that has gained traction in recent years is to buy real Instagram followers.

While this practice can boost a candidate’s visibility and credibility, it raises important ethical questions that need to be addressed.

Buying Instagram followers is a controversial method that involves purchasing followers from third-party services to artificially inflate an account’s follower count.

For political candidates, the appeal is clear: a larger following can create an impression of popularity, trustworthiness, and relevance, potentially swaying public opinion.

However, the ethical implications of this strategy are complex and multifaceted. Let’s delve into the key considerations surrounding the ethics of political campaigns and the practice of buying Instagram followers.

1. Authenticity vs. Deception

Buying Instagram followers blurs the line between authenticity and deception. When a candidate’s follower count is artificially boosted, it presents a false image of their actual support base. Voters may be misled into thinking that a candidate is more popular than they really are, thereby distorting their decision-making process.

2. Erosion of Trust

Trust is the cornerstone of political campaigns. Candidates who engage in buying followers risk undermining public trust by employing deceptive tactics. When the public perceives that politicians are more concerned with appearances than substance, it erodes confidence in the political process itself.

3. Unfair Competition

Buying Instagram followers can create an uneven playing field. Smaller, less well-funded candidates may find it challenging to compete with those who can afford to purchase followers. This disparity can stifle democratic principles by limiting the diversity of voices and ideas in the political landscape.


ALSO READ: Politicians Want to Revive the Flea Market


4. Quality over Quantity

Followers acquired through purchase often lack engagement and genuine interest in a candidate’s platform. In contrast, organic followers are more likely to be informed and committed supporters. Relying on quantity over quality can dilute the effectiveness of a political campaign.

5. Negative Public Perception

The practice of buying followers has garnered negative attention in the media and public discourse. When candidates are associated with such practices, it can tarnish their reputation and make them appear unethical and opportunistic.

6. Violation of Platform Policies

Most social media platforms, including Instagram, have policies against buying followers. Violating these policies can result in consequences such as account suspension or banning, adding another layer of ethical concern for political candidates.


The ethics of political campaigns are a topic of ongoing debate and consideration. While buying Instagram followers may provide a temporary boost in visibility, it poses significant ethical challenges. Candidates and their campaign teams must carefully weigh the short-term gains against the potential long-term damage to their reputation, public trust, and democratic principles. Ethical campaign practices are essential to building a healthier political landscape where transparency and authenticity prevail over deceptive shortcuts.

The Boomers, Social Media, And Politics

The Boomers, Social Media, And Politics

Many conservatives consequently became leftist as Donald Trump took control of the Republican Party. Not surprisingly, they have voted for Joe Biden because they were fed up with the current political situation.

Boomers and Social Media

According to statistics, approximately 23 percent of the American population are baby boomers. This generation is generally considered clueless and tends to be conservative. As Louis Leung wrote in “Generational Differences in Content Generation in Social Media” published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior (2013, PDF ), boomers were more fixated on television as a medium of information and entertainment. Very few of them really can download youtube videos online but they are open to changes.

Along with the development of technology, boomers slowly switched mediums. Now, they also use the internet to stay connected with friends and family. Moreover, in a pandemic like now.

Hanna Kozlowska, in her report for Quartz, said that boomer Facebook users had more than doubled during the 2012-2019 period. At least 37 percent of America’s boomer population now has a Facebook account.

Politics in Social Media

More boomers are exposed to content containing false information, especially in the days leading up to the election. It is common knowledge that social media is the best medium for politicians to get support. In fact, in ridiculous ways.

In 2016, for example, Cambridge Analytica advertised Trump’s strengths and Hillary Clinton’s weaknesses on Facebook. With a million dollars in funds, the ad can appear every day. The content has also been personalized by utilizing Facebook user data. The data is collected without the user’s consent through an application called The One Click Personality Test.

Not only that, but Cambridge Analytica also extracts data from the circle of friends of the application user. The move was obviously ridiculous, but Cambridge Analytica succeeded in having 5,000 personal data points for every voter in America — including those of the boomers.

In the 2020 elections, Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube have made policy changes. Even so, content containing misleading information and hate speech still floods. Social media was created to build social relationships.

Unfortunately, it was hijacked by political interests. Not just a link between peers, social media is apparently quite effective at spreading influence. Whether the platform’s founders realized this potential or not early in its development, they clearly failed to save its users.

Part of Social Media in Government

Part of Social Media in Government

Social media existed for more than ten years, but in the past few years, everything has changed. Nearly all individuals have smart telephones, and these phones have cameras. As taxpayers turn to discuss videos of law enforcement into websites, the press is on the rear. Since the government can use technology to better serve its people lawmakers must take notice. To gain more views and followers on YouTube, visit

Moving to Social Networking

Social networking reflects the needs of these people because people express their needs and needs in their group of friends. Representatives in Congress exist on Twitter and Facebook, thus to get hold of them, we have to monitor their email addresses. They are just 140 characters off.

The Congressional Management Foundation published the results of research in overdue 2015. Surveys have been issued to supporters of Senate and House members, communications supervisors, and supervisors and received responses. This provided a glimpse into the type of impact components could have by using networking platforms to participate in their lawmakers.

Following 80 percent of staffers, their work will require notice whether as few as 30 answers are attracted by a post the timeliness of these responses is a factor. 67% confessed that networking programs allowed lawmakers to have connections with their components. 70% stated that networking platforms, like Facebook and Twitter, have left member or their senator a lot more accountable to the people who they represent in Washington.

The poll also revealed that lawmakers have affiliation 71 percent of their time or their conclusions affected by responses from a group. Currently, each senator in the upper room has Facebook and Twitter, and use them regularly.

When things begin rolling on social networking, telephone numbers spread as individuals who agree or disagree with the tune of a politician. One thing that media can take credit for is that an increase in political participation and lawmakers should get on board.

Social media websites provide a special chance for lawmakers to make people conscious of what is occurring because not everybody keeps up with what’s happening in Washington. Lawmakers on websites supplies individuals feel much more connected, and also view behind the scenes.

The charge is awarded to the campaigns of President Obama, altering the landscape of politics and elections. It’s just in the past few decades the tendency has increased among state and local legislators. They must encourage frank and open discussion, and that they make them readily accessible for discussions around Facebook.

With media using such a reach, it’s frequently, and the way lawmakers can attain a vast assortment of people quickly, easily. By inviting involvement, and also giving components having a message the waves of communication will remain open.

Service Announcements (PSA) are a great way of increasing awareness. Municipal examples of PSAs on websites include financial and health, security tips from numerous departments. Movies can be a effortless and quick way to convey a message, however, even advertisements and graphics posted on Twitter and Facebook A caption could be equally as effective.