Showing posts with label christianity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label christianity. Show all posts

Sunday, 20 September 2015

Conservative Religions' Obsession With Rainbow Connections

Just coming out of yet another migraine. This one wiped me out pretty good all day long. So this means there will be nothing brilliant exiting this brain of mine. I will however draw a hopefully illuminating parallel.

I'm sure you've probably read about the Rainbow Doritos that sent some conservative writers into the stratosphere of insane over at Hemant Mehta's blog, right? I'll give you a hint: the writer somehow compared multi-coloured corn chips with anal sex. Why does everything have to be about buttsex with these people?

Well it turns out that these US conservatives - usually of the fundamentalist religious type - have problems with gay rainbows just like their Russian counterparts.

You know who else have problems with gay rainbows? Saudi authorities.

It's like all these groups are the same, or something. They're all scared silly of the gay - obsessed, in fact.

(Image source)

Wednesday, 16 September 2015

Free Streaming of New Documentary About Christianity's Obsession with Sex & Purity

Not a scene from the movie, but I found it strangely fitting.
Have you ever noticed that the more fundamentalist and conservative the Christians, the more obsessed they appear to be about sex? It seems to range from remaining chaste before marriage to marrying Jesus and remaining chaste for the rest of their lives. It seems like sex is a really big deal for Christians.

No Sex Please, We're Purity Nuts.

So, there's a really interesting movie that's going to be available for free streaming over at Vimeo, tomorrow: Give Me Sex Jesus (@GiveMeSexJesus).
Give Me Sex Jesus tells six personal stories of struggle from within the Evangelical community to remain sexually pure until marriage. But what happens when our bodies and desires do not behave?

A handsome couple saves their first kiss for the altar; a gay son comes out to his famous family; a transgender man searches for authenticity; and a feminist confronts double standards. While the control of desire is universal, the salvation of these people depends upon it.

Since the 1990s, the Purity Movement has been at the center of a national conversation about sexuality that extends from the pew into the Oval Office. Give Me Sex Jesus invites you into the pleasure, shame, and humor at the intersection of faith and sex in America.
It's is a production of Side Hug Films and is produced and directed by Matt Barber and produced and written by Brittany Machado (@BrittLynnMach). It comes as a result of a successful Kickstarter campaign launched in 2012 and completed in 2014. (This last point answers my own question about why the movie is being released for free.)

According to the press kit, the film will contain taped interviews from a wide array of people - both pro sexual purity and con.
Interviewees include Dr. Richard Ross (founder of the Purity Movement, True Love Waits), Stephanie Drury (Stuff Christian Culture Likes), Chris Bright (grandson of founder, Campus Crusade for Christ), and Dr. Amy DeRogatis (author, Saving Sex). Personal stories include a couple who saved their first kiss for the altar; a gay son who came out to his famous family; a transgender man who searched for authenticity; a feminist who confronts sexual double standards; and more.
You can watch the trailer below.

Give Me Sex Jesus - 2015 TRAILER from Matt Barber on Vimeo.

The film's website even features a supportive from atheist blogger, Hemant Mehta:
They’re not pushing an agenda that says Christians are right or wrong. They’re only interested in telling the stories of people who grew up with these rules around them and explaining where this sex-negativity (my term, not theirs) comes from.
I found another short clip from the film on Vimeo which explores how purity has racial baggage in the United States due to its history of racial segregation and minority persecution.

Give Me Sex Jesus: The Impure History of Purity from Matt Barber on Vimeo.

Looks real interesting! So apparently if you go to the site, you can watch the movie tomorrow starting 6pm PST, for free.

(Image source)

Wednesday, 26 August 2015

Imagine How Loudly They'd Scream If They Were Actually Being Persecuted?

Today, Hemant Mehta wrote about the extreme drama you'll find in Christian web media concerning the war on Christianity and the persecution of Christians in America. Yes, Christians are forced to not be in violation of the Constitution. What is the world coming to?

Then we have this from Fox News. What is this guy talking about? How can you even call this news?

(Image Source)

Friday, 21 August 2015

Podcast #5 - Peachy Fiend

How do I do it? Only God knows - which means nobody.

Episode, the fifth, features a whole new discussion with Twitter celeb, spoken word and singing sensation Peachy Fiend (@PeachyFiend)!

I was going to write a blog post critiquing this article, Gimme that old-time atheism...
Most contemporary atheists get it wrong. Today’s atheism tends to stand on an absolutely self-contradictory claim: only that which can be seen can be known. (It’s a pseudo-scientific claim.) The application of this sentiment to God is simple. Because God can’t be seen, God can’t be known. The problem with the statement is simple.

... but then I realized that it's way more fun to kick back and shoot the shit with Peachy. So, here's your homework. Read the article, maybe, and then go listen to the podcast and nod your head vigorously in agreement or disagreement. Hope you don't get whiplash.

I got my new microphone, so you'll get to hear me making my radio voice every once and awhile. I'm definitely an FM kind of guy, you'll be able to tell. And no, I'm not trying to pick you up, but it might sound that way. If that works for you, then who am I to argue?

Anyway! You can watch this episode over at Youtube or right here, below:

Here's where you can subscribe to My Secret Atheist PodcastITunesSoundcloud,  RSS URLYoutube, Stitcher (coming soon.)


Ep 5 : Peachy Fiend

In this episode we talk with Twitter counter-apologist @PeachyFiend for the first time. We do a paragraph by paragraph analysis of a bewildering article by assistant professor of theology and philosophy at Carroll College, Eric E. Hall: ‘Gimme that old-time atheism’ (

Sean got his new microphone too! So he’s trying out his radio voice. Please be patient with him!

Music Credits: 

‘Freedom voice of my soul’ by Art Boys Collection. (
‘Shame On You’ by Spade Cooley. (

(Image source)

Sunday, 16 August 2015

St Petersburg Orthodox Christians Not Happy With Zombie Walk

There was a Zombie Walk flashmob in St. Petersburg over the weekend. Hundreds of young people got together in a gruesomely hilarious carnival mood, like Halloween in August. Local Christian groups also participated by being gruesomely ironic.
However, there is strong opposition to such events from a number of Christian activists, who describe zombie gatherings as harming the minds of minors and “popularizing death.” The Narodnij Sbor group has called for such walks to be banned.

I would not want to advocate the ideology of death. There are a lot of children committing suicide in the city,” the head of the group, Anatoliy Artyuh, told Rosbalt news agency. According to Artyuh, there are too many evil spirits out there as it is.

The Orthodox group said it will film the event and then let experts decide whether the flashmob is a healthy thing for society. The group intends to call for an outright ban of such events.
Why are they always out to ban everything? And why are they always scaring little children with stories of evil spirits and Hell?

I'd like to remind everyone that this Jesus fellow got whipped, nailed to a cross, died and came back three days later - only to once again shed his mortal coil shortly after.

Martin, the organizer of the walk advises the Orthodox groups that they should hope that there are some survivors left to voice their concerns to. As, according to walk rules, zombies can only make moaning noises, which wouldn't be very productive for fruitful dialogue.

(Top image source)

Thursday, 13 August 2015

Podcast #4 - Carolyn Hyppolite

Somehow, I keep churning out weekly podcasts. This week, I'm happy to present you with my latest aural endeavor, My Secret Atheist Podcast episode 4!

Episode, the fourth, features a whole new discussion with author and speaker Carolyn Hyppolite who has written Still Small Voices: The Testimony of a Born-Again Atheist and will be appearing soon at the Non-Con near Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario.

This episode is really interesting. You get to hear about some of the inside machinations of people running a pro-life (anti-abortion) pregnancy crisis center type "clinic" - among other insights from Carolyn's fascinating past!

You'll also get to hear me apologize about the lousy sound quality. I have since gotten my mic, so I hope that things will improve. The episode itself though, seems to have been cursed in several ways - including a copyright violation on the music I got off  This had me go back to the original project file... which promptly corrupted itself. The backup also failed! So I ended up cutting a pretty cheesy Google-endorsed free song directly into the previously saved MP3! My apologies to Carolyn and everyone.

Anyway! You can watch this episode over at Youtube or right here, below:

Here's where you can subscribe to My Secret Atheist PodcastITunesSoundcloud,  RSS URLYoutube, Stitcher (coming soon.)


Ep 4 : Carolyn Hyppolite

Carolyn Hyppolite

- Growing up Catholic.
- Proselytizing.
- Working in a Pro Life “crisis center.”
- Christ-centered religion.
- Problems with the Bible.
- Dating a Theist.
- Still Small Voices: The Testimony of a Born-Again Atheist

The Non-Conference -

Music Credits:
Opening/Close: “Smooth Talker” - Google Free Music

(Image source)

Tuesday, 11 August 2015

Duggar Son-In-Law: "Believing in Evolution Is Totally Racist"

Jessa and Ben Seewald at Arby's. (source)
It's been awhile since we heard from any of the Duggars ever since their show got canceled. Remember that?

Hey, do you recall Jessa Seewald (née Duggar)? She posts all kinds of neat stuff like this and this. She also likes to post videos with her hubby Ben Seewald who does important "«research»" discovering that atheists don't actually exist!

Is this sufficient literary exposition? Are we all caught up now? Excellent! Let's take a look at this, then!

It's some advice from Ben and his buddy Dante Berry about how Christians should respond to racism. I think it has to do with not being racist (duh!) and not believing in evil, racist EVIL-ution... maybe? I don't know.

It goes something like this:
Lots of racism and stuff. Let's check the Bible at Mark 3... blah blah... 
That’s right, there’s no room for racism in Christianity. That all comes from the Devil. That all comes from, like, this false religion out here, evolution, that stuff? Teaching that, like, some people are ‘more evolved?' ... and stuff.”
The more I watch certain videos, the more I think that perhaps some people are more evolved. That would be rude though, so please strike it from the record.

I sort of follow what Dante is saying. Ben sort of confuses me. I do wish he would substitute words with actual meanings in place of whatever the hell that was.

Thursday, 6 August 2015

My Secret Atheist Podcast - Episode Three

I'm pretty sure you all have figured out the pattern by now. Last week episode two of My Secret Atheist Podcast came out. This week, I'm happy to present you with the latest fruit of my loom, My Secret Atheist Podcast episode 3!

Episode, the third, features further discussion with Baptist apologist blogger, Anthony Freeland who blogs at Truth InterruptedWe wrap up the discussion we started in episode 2 about same-sex marriage.

You can watch this episode over at Youtube or right here, below:

Here's where you can subscribe to My Secret Atheist PodcastITunesSoundcloud,  RSS URLYoutube, Stitcher (coming soon.)


Sean McGuire (@GodlessPoutine
Anthony Freeland

Drop Date: August 6, 2015


- The situation in Alabama.
- The situation in Quebec.
- What about the Muslims and Hindus?
- Tony revises things with a phone message.

- What if all the politicians were atheists?

Music Credits:

Opening: “Red​-​Headed Woman” - Pk jazz Collective - (source)

Close: “The Cadillac Rocker” - Marius Joppich - (source)

Phone Sound: “Telephone 3 Rings & Pickup Sound Effect” - (source)

(Image source)

Friday, 31 July 2015

My Secret Atheist Podcast - Episode Two

Somehow, the stars have aligned and we've been able to birth episode two of ... My Secret Atheist Podcast!

Episode, the second, features further discussion with Baptist apologist blogger, Anthony Freeland who blogs at Truth Interrupted. We had  discussion about marriage, same-sex marriage, wedding cakes in Oregon and the Kalam Cosmological Argument.

We spoke on for so long that my finger went numb cutting out any superfluous content to make even half the material fix into 40 minutes. I promise to work on that, and get a mic in future episodes.

You can watch this episode over at Youtube or right here, below:

Here's where you can subscribe to My Secret Atheist PodcastITunesSoundcloud,  RSS URLYoutube, Stitcher (coming soon.)


Sean McGuire (@GodlessPoutine
Anthony Freeland

Drop Date: July 31, 2015


- The history of marriage.
- Same-sex marriage in Quebec, Canada.
- Same-sex marriage in the USA.
- the bakery which refused to provide gay wedding care in Oregon.
- Impromptu Kalam cosmological argument discussion - first of many, probably.

Music Credits:

Opening: “Headphones on Your Heart: Square Wail remix” - leeni - (source)

Close: “Summer Crush” - shirobon - (source)

Middle: “Superluminal Motion” - little-scale - (source)

(Image source)

Wednesday, 29 July 2015

The Pastors & Street Epistemologists of Periscope

Anyone following me on Twitter has probably come to the conclusion that I am completely addicted to Periscope. The description on ITunes doesn't quite do justice to the app.
Periscope lets you broadcast live video to the world. Going live will instantly notify your followers who can join, comment and send you hearts in real time. The more hearts you get, the higher they flutter on the screen.
My favourite scope at the moment belongs to LA comedian (Last Comedian StandingEsther Povitsky (@littleesther) - you can watch some scope re-runs here.

But why is this on my atheism blog? It's because a lot of Christian pastors are really jumping on the bandwagon. Lifeway, a sort of resource for pastors, has a primer on scoping for pastors.
Could you imagine the Apostle Paul, remaining unconvinced that new routes of commerce and cultural communication were not worth the effort in spreading the gospel of Christ?

This Pastor’s Primer for Periscope is designed to educate and inspire the everyday leader, even those only marginally involved in social media, to the possibilities of Periscope for you and your team.
The guide recommends pastors share some God time with viewers - which is actually less interesting than watching Esther's dirty laundry pile - which is surprisingly compelling and Zen-like.

Since Periscope clears away old videos older than 24 hours, here are some pastor scopes saved on church sites or Youtube.

Ron Carpenter: Pastor on Periscope Moments

Jerry Laudermilk: Morning Drive With Pastor/Periscope

Pastors do appear to be flooding into the medium - which is only 4 months old - but they are not the only ones. Street Epistemologist Anthony Magnabosco has started live scoping his excellent street epistemology conversations while taping his Youtube videos.

It will be interesting to see where this technology will lead. Twitter bought the company which created Periscope for $100 million, so they must believe there's something to this.

I think it could have a similar impact to Twitter. The ease with which you can share yourself or surroundings online is truly stunning.

Monday, 27 July 2015

Detroit Catholic Militant Group Drives Their Own Statue Around to 'Counteract' Baphomet Statue

Catholic group sticks their own angel statue on a truck and performs their own magical counter ritual!
There's so much awesome going down in Detroit that, although I usually don't cover American news, I really must write about the wild and insane reactions evangelical Christian groups are having in Detroit to a statue.

I won't go into the whole story. You can read about how an impressive Baphomet statue was crowdfunded by the Satanic Temple to counter a Ten Commandments monument on Oklahoma Capitol grounds. The legislators there pulled some sort of ridiculous voodoo and blocked the statue.

After being shafted by so-called secular government several times, the Satanists decided to unveil the completed statue in Detroit, where they have a significant presence. This caused the local Christian population to flip out and all sorts of nasty threats were made by these good Jesus followers.

Here's a sampling of just how welcoming and ecumenical some local Christian groups were. It's a panel discussion between Satanic Temple's Jex Blackmore - who is calm, intelligent, and rational - and pastor David Bullock - who appears scared, irrational and ... well... like he's lost his shit.

Fox 2 News Headlines

The good pastor is rather rude, quite frankly. One of the other preachers at the start of the video even suggested that a mere statue will rain down woe upon the city! Because: it's cursed!
The will affect our families, our homes and our marriage! We will not allow it in the city of Detroit!
The Catholics tried praying, but it didn't work! Satan is so strong!
Area Catholics held a special mass aimed at countering the spirit of the Satanists.

About 250 parishioners and supporters gathered Saturday morning at St. Joseph Catholic Church to pray for Detroit.
Well, during the unveiling, a crack squad of Militant Catholics strapped a statue of Archangel Michael to the back of a truck and drove it around the building housing the satanic statue thrice! They have protected Detroit! found the location, and several of its staff infiltrated the building, “where a loud party was in full swing,” the Catholic group said on its website.

“An earlier downpour had come through the roof and flooded the dance floor, and approximately 100 people milled around the dark, smoke-filled room. As the rain ceased, more people trickled in, and towards midnight the number went up to about 400. On one side of the room stood an inverted red cross, and on the other the nine-foot-tall statue of Baphomet, covered in a white sheet.”

But Church Militant brought their own version of a heavenly statue, only instead of a fallen angel, theirs was a sculpture of the Archangel Michael.

Church Militant had a 6-foot bronze statue of the archangel, which they hauled in a flatbed truck and prayed the prayer of St. Michael while encircling the site three times.
“We brought our six-foot bronze statue of St. Michael, who normally rests in our Abp. Fulton J. Sheen studio, as a counter-witness to the blasphemous goat-headed statue of Baphomet, meant to represent Satan,” the Catholic group said on its website. “According to Scripture, St. Michael is the angel who did battle against Lucifer and cast him out of Heaven into the Abyss.”
Spooky Statue Wars! I'm sure that will work though.

Why did they choose this particular statue? Well, it's more ecumenicalism.
The Book of Revelation (12:7-9) describes a war in heaven in which Michael, being stronger, defeats Satan: there was war in heaven. Michael and his angels fought against the dragon, and the dragon and his angels fought back.

I bet that makes the Satanists feel great. I look forward to these two groups working together in the future.

So, after being shutdown by city councils and threatened by angry Christians, the statue was unveiled in Lauhoff Corporation building in the Rivertown Warehouse District. That's right, they were chased into the warehouse district. Truly, the Christians are oppressed.

The Satanic Temple plans to move the statue to Arkansas because their state capitol has also decided to show unconstitutional deference to Christianity.

One fantastic novel which opened my eyes to alternate points of view of Satan is Anatole France's Révolte des anges (Revolte of the Angels) - which casts the devil and his angels as struggling against a tyrant overlord god.

(Image source)

Friday, 24 July 2015

Declaring Christianity Liberia's National Religion Risks Destabilizing Entire Country

There's a fascinating piece over at Think Progress about the perilous situation Liberia finds itself in as some local Christian groups there are fighting to have the country declared a Christian Nation.
In April, lawmakers successfully proposed a constitutional amendment that, if approved, would reinstate Christianity as the official state religion. This attempt follows Christian leaders’ fruitless efforts in 2013 to submit a similar petition to lawmakers in the Liberian House and Senate.
Christian groups - and apparently the vast majority of Liberians - seem to want this to happen. However, minority religious groups in the country are calling for secularism and no state endorsement of any religion.
Now that it’s in President Sirleaf’s hands, the proposal could appear on a national referendum next year — a possibility that troubles Liberian followers of Islam who are concerned about the advent of state-sanctioned persecution and marginalization.

Earlier this year, protesters converged on the site of a constitutional conference to demand the constitution remain unchanged. “Liberia is not for Christians. Liberia is not for Muslims. Liberia is for everybody. We don’t want Liberia to be for only one group of people,” protest leader Hajah Swaray told the Anadolu news agency. “It would not be fair to see one group marginalized. We have 16 tribes in Liberia. Some people are Muslims, while others are Bahai or embrace traditional religions. Let’s just live as we are.”
The article goes on to point out that increased tribal and ethnic tension - presumably also religious conflict - has preceded both gruesome civil wars in the country.

It's a fascinating read and shows how secularism is something which ought to be sought after by not only atheists, but the religious as well.

(Image source)

Thursday, 23 July 2015

My Secret Atheist Podcast - Episode One

Hey, what? I just made my first ever podcast! It's called... wait for it!... My Secret Atheist Podcast!

Episode, the first, features introduction and some discussion with Baptist apologist blogger, Anthony Freeland who blogs at Truth Interrupted. I'm sure you'll remember he did a blogging debate with me not long ago. I admitted at the time that formal debates aren't my cup of tea and I'd prefer some kind of discussion format, instead.

For now the plan is to have discussions with Anthony about current day topics. Later, I want to have alternating guests and even panels!

You can watch this episode over at Youtube or right here, below:

Here's where you can subscribe to My Secret Atheist PodcastITunesSoundcloud,  RSS URLYoutube, Stitcher (coming soon.)

In addition to the show notes below, I'd like to apologize for the crappy audio quality. We started out with already crappy headsets on rather crappy Skype only for me to talk into my webcam mic rather than the headset.

Also, please excuse the rambling. I've edited the tape to remove umms and when we were flung too brutally off topic.


Sean McGuire (@GodlessPoutine)
Anthony Freeland

Drop Date: July 23, 2015

- Tony’s story.
- Sean’s story.
- Catholicism and the Bible.
- What evidence would be needed for Sean to believe in God.
- Is Tony’s conversion story based on logical reasoning or evidence?
- Not another “Does God Exist Show”
- One million “umms” edited out.
- Sean needs a mic and studio, badly.

Music Credits:
Opening: “Cream Soda Slurpees” - Sean’s friend Counterpoint (1989-1992) on his Amiga 500!  - (source

Close: “Mother 3 - Porky's Porkies (Cover)” - greatspaceadventure - (source

Middle: “sonic death rabbit - dead rabbit lullaby (lsdj)” - baseck - (source)

(Image source)

Wednesday, 15 July 2015

New App to Keep Track of All Your Prayers!

There's an app for that.
Can you imagine following a god who's omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent and yet requires constant reminding and nagging about what he ought to do next? Well, I can't, but it seems that Christians have this major problem keeping track of all the things they need to be praying about all the time.

What about aunt Ruby's shingles? Who's going to pray for those to clear up? Then there's your kid's algebra exam - if it's not for your muttering of words to yourself, he'll bomb that thing. What about your sports team? How about the weather tomorrow?

God needs reminding and with today's busy life, I'm happy to report that there's a new app to take care of this available on iPhone and Android! It's a Prayer Manager called Echo!
We believe that prayer is a powerful and effective way for us to connect with God. If you're anything like us, the biggest obstacles that keep you from praying are difficulty organizing or keeping a list of your prayers, then actually remembering to pray for those things when life gets busy. Echo was created to solve these problems, and to give you space to engage with your Creator.
It appears to be a specialized calendar to ensure you get enough praying done in the day to keep the Earth spinning - cuz those godless heathen atheists certainly aren't doing it!


Echo lets you keep a list of every single one of your prayers. You can add as many prayers as you want, organize them into groups, delete old prayers, and even mark prayers as answered so you can see how God is working (and remember to thank Him!).
That's right! You can measure God's effectiveness! I'm waiting for some analytics on this - maybe a map to see where the highest scores are for believers.

Gee, this is such a great idea, I wonder why God doesn't just use reminders. Then he wouldn't need people using apps to remind them who and what's important enough to pray for during the day! I guess God must not have a smartphone yet.

Nothing fails like prayer except perhaps an app to remind you to pray.

(Images source:

Saturday, 11 July 2015

Video & Reaction to Christopher DiCarlo & Conrad Black: 'The Decline of Christianity'

Conrad Black and Faith Goldy.
In April, I posted about a live taping of The Zoomer. The program appears to be my television nightmare and is hosted by Conrad Black and Faith Goldy.
THE DECLINE OF CHRISTIANITY? Hosts Conrad Black and Faith Goldy explore the fate of Christianity in the wake of diminishing congregations and persecution in the Middle East.
I witnessed the episode and it was, on the whole, dreadful. It was only my sheer determination to get through it alive and report it back to you, dear readers, which prevented me from throttling myself. Black seemed to use it as his own platform for trashing atheism - I guess he wants to expand his print attack into other media.

Thankfully, the program did have a single atheist, Christopher DiCarlo, who valiantly worked to counter an otherwise completely religious panel. Also, the co-host who believed that religion is under attack, and Black who even brought on Dr John Lennox - to talk trash about atheism with - at the end of the show.

You can watch the embedded video below or go to the site. You can skip ahead to 23 minutes, if you prefer.

I emailed DiCarlo after watching the program and asked him his opinion about his treatment on the show, the (little) time allocated to him given the topic, and how he felt about having John Lennox on at the end of the program.
Lord Black is Catholic. I'm not sure what kind of Christian Faith Goldy is. But the entire show, from Moses Znaimer to the audience, are predominantly faith-based.

Even one of the ways the show was pitched i.e. is Christianity in decline because of Muslim persecution, demonstrates a victim perspective.

Conrad is very emotional. I think this is partially due to the fact that the numbers don't lie. Organized religions in the West are in decline. Catholicism's only hope is to pitch their views to developing nations and other parts of the world that are still hanging on due to generational or familial ties -- hence, the reason Pope Francis is from Argentina. I thought is was a bit disrespectful to me for Black to show clips of his interview with Lennox and NOT state that just a few days earlier, I had a lengthy dialogue with Lennox:

I was also surprised that John Lennox did not mention our discussion either. I have gone out of my way to refuse to debate but accept the invitation for dialogue. And I even went so far as to suggest that he and I take opposing sides -- in the interest of fairness -- so we can better understand why we might have such diametrically opposed world views. But no theist has ever accepted my proposal.
DiCarlo also mentioned that he really felt like the token non-believer thrown into the mix. However, he did receive some good feedback from some of the attendees in the audience.

I have similar thoughts. Although, I wonder how much value appearance on these programs actually brings. Whereas, I can understand why David Silverman goes onto Fox News - to bring publicity - I wonder how much this program is actually watched. Then again... I wonder how many people read this blog!

That said, I'll end this post with the dialogue between DiCarlo and Lennox. I haven't watched it yet, but it's likely to be much more worthwhile.

(image source)

Friday, 3 July 2015

Parody Mitt Romney's Interesting Take on Christian Morality

Mitt Romney (source)
There are a lot of really good progressive politics shows from south of the border. In addition to liking the David Pakman Show, I also regularly listen to the hilarious Jimmy Dore Show, to which Mystery Science Theater's Frank Conniff is a regular contributor.

The program often makes fun of religion gone extra crazy on their Oh My God segment. Their most recent episode is a collection of some of their funnier stuff. In it there is a parody interview with a parody Mitt Romney (voiced by Mike Macrae) which very neatly explains much that is wrong with Christian -- or indeed most religious morality.

Here's an embedded player version cued up the the right part (8:25). The full episode is here.

Romney is making excuses for Josh Duggar and the coverup actions of his family after it was revealed he had incestuously molested girls -- including his sisters -- when he was younger.
Lemme explain. Jimmy, you secular progressives have it all wrong. You don't understand Christian morality. People like you think that acts are wrong. Things that people do are wrong. And that people are judged by the actions they make.

In truth the reverse is true. People are good or bad. If someone is, like, part of your class or race or tribe or religion, they're good people. If they do bad things, those are mistakes that God forgives. But if someone is not like you, then their sins are worse and they need to be set on fire.

That is Christian morality. I mean, what else would you expect from a tradition was born, literally, of tribalism?

Good comedy and satire can explain concepts so succinctly! If you liked that, I highly recommend you listen to the entire podcast.

Wednesday, 1 July 2015

Confederate Flag 'Brand': The Need to Critically Re-examine Symbols From Our Youth

A 1959 protest against admission of first 9 black students to an Arkansas white only high school. (source)
The following is a guest post by Phoebe Helen, a reader from Delaware, who is both an atheist and a Humanist. Due to her employment situation, she would prefer to use a pen name. It is about how we can be born and trapped into labels which mean very different things to different people.

I was frankly baffled over the past week to see one of my typically kind and tolerant facebook friends posting alarmist article after dismaying image after hyperbolic update defending the Confederate Flag and the protection of her Southern Heritage.  I watched with mounting agitation as day after day her passion on the subject grew. Where had this come from? Finally, I asked her.
I've been struggling with trying to understand why this is your issue, the thing you feel so strongly about that, as you said a few days ago, you are willing to take up arms (did you mean kill people?) over. I've not been arguing, I've just been trying to understand. But I don't. Please help me. What, exactly, is the heritage that you think this flag stands for, that you want to protect, other people's feelings be damned? I'm not getting it, and I know you are a nice person. Please define this "heritage" for me. Thank you.
I expected her response to include concepts like states’ rights and freedom of speech. Instead, I got:
It's first kisses, first dances. and first time falling in love. It's holding hands at the county fair and riding the upside down rides for the first time. It's football game noises and nachos accidentally spilled on a girl in a fur coat in front of me. It's hay rides in the fall. It's winter dances and the song Blueberry Hill. It's cutting classes and getting a burger at lunch. Every good memory I have as a young person has this flag in it. 
Ah-ha, I thought. This I understand. This is what kept me a Christian for so long. My “brand”. Wearing a cross necklace signaling to others, “I’m a good person.” Looking for symbols to find those ‘raised right’ the way I was, who could be trusted. My brand of people.

My friend’s thinking seems to be going something like this: She’s a good person. Her friends are good people. The flag is integrally woven into their collective childhood memories, and has become part of their identity. If we say, based on every available fact, that the flag is racist, her mind takes a dip in the pool of cognitive dissonance, where logic is lost in the murky depths. She does not self-identify as a racist. She has joyful images swimming through her mind with the flag as backdrop. Ergo, the flag is not offensive. The people attacking “us” and calling “us” racist are trying to associate our beloved flag with those crazies who have co-opted it into white supremacy. Get out the pitchforks to defend against this attack on our heritage, our memories, our very identities!

It’s a branding problem. The flag absolutely is racist. Those “crazies” using the flag are in fact following the ‘manufacturer’s instructions’ that came with the brand – Please use this flag to fight for superiority of the white race. Repeat as necessary until superiority achieved.

A similar thing is going on with Christianity. The most fundamental believers are considered by the religious moderates to be “the crazies” for trying to legislate six-thousand-year-old beliefs around values and science. They are following ‘manufacturer’s instructions for use of Bible’. Moderates and fundamentalists want to use the Christian cross to convey very different meanings, and each group thinks the others are not real Christians:
God is angry and vengeful, the cross is a battle flag, woe to the non-believer.

God is loving and tolerant, the cross is about acceptance, we adapt to changing times. 
Here is the thing about brands, which corporations know and fear – You don’t get to tell people what your brand means. They figure it out on their own, based on what they read and what they know about history and actions. If you fly your Confederate flag based on feel-good nostalgia, I am going to look at you and see a racist. If you wear your cross necklace based on warm-fuzzy feelings about love and forgiveness, I’m going to see you and get all jittery about right-wing extremists preaching intolerance and unconcerned with issues of social justice.

An important part of becoming a better society is coming to an understanding that some of the things that divide us are due to our tying our own self-identities to logos that don’t actually mean to others what we intend them to mean. Our ties to these brands weren’t consciously made based on our logical analysis of what this symbol stood for, comparing it to all other available symbolism, and choosing a banner that best suited our adult selves. You were most likely born into the symbols and raised to think everything that you love about yourself can be credited to the brand.
I’m a good Christian.

I’m a Southern Belle.

I’m a Southern Gentleman. 
Better would be:
I’m a good Person. I can read, think and understand exactly what a symbol stands for, and decide whether I actually do stand for what it really represents. 
The good news, as Bob Dylan would sing, is that the times, they are a changing. People are increasingly abandoning their associations with these symbols as a conscious decision to no longer lend their credibility to those who are “crazy”. Many are coming to understand this basic concept -- If others have a high likelihood of incorrectly interpreting my brand and thus developing a negative feeling about me, if I myself am appalled by what these “true believers” represent, then it is time for me to leave behind these brands to the ‘crazies’ and move forward. 

Minds once unthinkingly occupied by symbols are activating; people are waking up. They are dealing with the dissonance, and emerging intact. They still have their memories, their good behaviors, kindnesses and positive self images.  Like Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz, they never needed their ruby slippers. They had the goodness inside of them all along.

Wednesday, 24 June 2015

Practical Advice on How to Deal With Spellcasters in Your Prayer Room

You know what can really put a damper on prayer room calls? Spellcasting witches and wizards and generic satanic sorts leaving their ghoulish spam mail all over the place, that's what. So learned Jennifer Leclaire, senior editor of Charisma.
Earlier this year, we started our Mornings With the Holy Spirit devotion and prayer calls at 6 a.m. One of my intercessors felt strongly there were unbelievers on the line one morning and some days there is clearly enemy resistance to our prayers. Of course, we always press through and God brings refreshing, inspiration and revelation despite what the devil has in mind.

On the call each morning, I encourage the listeners to leave a prayer request at Every day, we get a number of prayer requests for healing, reconciliation in marriages, financial breakthrough and more. Recently, though, the spell casters have invaded the site. Indeed, the prince of the power of the air has reared his ugly head at Thankfully, none of the requests go live since everything is monitored.
It seems that Jennifer is talking about spam comments on boards about (usually African) witch doctors. I know all about it because this blog gets them a lot.

I've gotten comments about doctors Aziza, Sambola, Shekiri, Adesuwa, Oga, Iyare, Ogidigan... etc... it goes on and on. I have gotten hundreds. They're all powerful spellcasters who will be able to solve any issue for you. I picked up a card from one in the Metro a couple of weeks ago as well.

Here's one of the shorter ones this blog received a couple of weeks ago.
Hey are you crying that your lover has left you and the kids for another woman, you don't have to cry anymore because i was in the same position till i heard about Dr. Ekpen of Ekpen Temple how he has help so many people in there are relationship, today i can boldly recommend Dr. Ekpen Of Ekpen Temple to someone for help. He did not fail me i also believe he can not fail you too contact him at ...
As expected, I only take these seriously by feeling mighty sorry for anyone being duped into believing these witch doctors are doing anything other than pilfering their money. While I'm not so sure about Leclaire and the folks over at Charisma. They really do seem to believe there is something more going on here than mere charlatanism.

Not necessarily a belief that these spells actually do something, but rather that they are a distraction from the true religion brought on by the devil.
Many others with fake names rave about this "powerful spell caster." But it seems there's some competition in the witchcraft camp because others who try to work their way onto the site are praising Dr. Benedict as the ultimate spell caster, who successfully casts love spells. Still others point to a man named Ezzia, the "very good love spell caster" and Dr. Ekaka. Oh, and let's not forget about Dr. Aisabu. All of these witches are trying to advertise their services at and the volume has increased over the last few weeks. Again, none of these ever make it on to the site because we moderate the comments. But the devil sure is persistent.
Although, Leclair has written recently about a revival and uptick of witchcraft -- a practice which can apparently lead to infirmities and hellfire.
As you may know, I've written a book dealing with spiritual witchcraft called Satan's Deadly Trio: Defeating the Deceptions of Jezebel, Witchcraft and Religion. Many times, infirmities are rooted in the devil's witchcraft—and sometimes it comes from the spirit of Jezebel. The Bible talks about Jezebel and her witchcrafts (2 Kin. 9:22). Witchcraft can't heal you, but it can release confusion, sickness and disease, depression and other ailments. At our recent women's conference, Jesus healed 23 ladies—and several of them were afflicted with witchcraft.
I nearly forgot the practical advice. If you have spell casters in your prayer room or church or city or whatever, you're supposed to drive them out. 

What's most amusing here, I guess, are the two sole comments to her post about these charlatan sorcerer spammers:

That's right. Two spams about "Dr ovia" who will use magic spells to solve all your problems.

Sunday, 21 June 2015

There's a Hula Girl on My Dashboard: How I Left Faith Behind & Embraced Life

Portion of book cover. (source)
Earlier this month, I put up a guest post by author logospilgrim, Trapped No Longer: I Left Religion, Found Beauty in This Life & the Courage to Embrace it As Myself

There, her words spoke of mental shackles and bonds which blocked her self discovery and undermined her mission to find peace and meaning in this world. They are one picture from a thick album which recounts the long voyage of discovery she traveled from fundamentalist Christianity, to Orthodox Christianity and finally towards Secular Humanism. It wasn't easy --all the while, she was discovering her own identity as an androgyne, bi-romantic asexual person. She was questing for a home within religions hostile to anything which lay to either side of their dogma blinders.

You can find the whole album, the entire story -- or at least all which has been put down into ink and parchment -- within her beautifully written mini odyssey, There’s a Hula Girl on my Dashboard: How I Left Faith Behind and Embraced Life. I recommend it. It's simple and honest. It's humble and empowering.

From Amazon:
"I didn't need to be redeemed from any unacceptable state. I didn't suffer from any metaphysical disease. I was a living, mortal, fragile, complex sentient being, and that was fine. I could make my own decisions. I could think for myself. I had my own voice." In There's a Hula Girl on my Dashboard: How I Left Faith Behind and Embraced Life, writer, lecturer, and maverick Logospilgrim candidly shares the remarkable and passionate journey that took her from religious belief to secular humanism.
I also found a single typo in the entire document, which is astonishingly good for a self-published manuscript. Believe me, I've read a number of self published books lately and this is truly refreshing.

Rather than dwell on the quality of the work itself, I thought I'd share a few passages with you from the book which stuck out for me, personally.
Then, confronted by my persistent defiance of miraculous prayer and by my failure to serve up an inspiring, praise-the-Lord metamorphosis, the pastor and his wife told me the following words: “We’re not sure you’re saved.”

We were in the kitchen. I heard the words and felt my heart sink into the ground. I felt... How can I describe the despair that went through me like a barbed lance?

“We think you’re going to hell.” That’s what I was told.

“There’s no hope for you.”

And it’s not that I didn’t try... I tried. I tried and I tried. I wanted to make Jesus happy; I believed in love. But I could never measure up. I was a disappointment. Between the ages of sixteen and nineteen, I think I must have cried in every dark corner I could find in that cafeteria-like Baptist church, with its plain walls and wooden chairs and many Bibles.

I remember holding on to mine. I remember underlining passages, running my fingers across the precious, thin white pages.

But my pain was like rust, causing bits of me to flake away and cave in and fall off. I wasn’t a good Christian like all the other young people. I often felt afraid of them. My self-hatred and my anger increased. Which made me even less acceptable. I could sense the pastor’s disapproval. I could see the way he’d look at me.

I didn’t want to stay in his house anymore.

They had a baby while I was there. I remember one time, the pastor’s wife was babysitting someone else’s infant, I forget whose. It was small, a fragile-looking thing, unlike their larger child, and it would weep and weep unless it was being held. She let it cry, and then at one point she picked it up, saying she would give it “a little break,” but she was clearly unimpressed. And she said that this baby
was “selfish.” It wasn’t being raised correctly. That’s why it was small.

I never forgot that.

I once asked the pastor what he’d do if their child had problems like me when it was older. He said that he was sure their child would be “a blessing from God.”

Well, I was probably not saved, and all that. What candyou do.

I had to leave. I couldn’t stand it anymore.

What if it was okay, just being a Homo sapiens?

The more I thought about it, the freer and more at peace I felt. The “dreadful consequences” of living without the divine force were dropping from my consciousness like the insubstantial threats, manipulative tactics, and rampant ignorance they’d always been.

The relationship I’d had with Christianity and its deities was now looking like an abusive marriage. As long as I submitted to them, I was “okay.” They would care for me, love me, protect me; all I had to do was accept everything I was told, only have the few friends they approved of, not think about anything they didn’t want me to, not question their authority, be completely dependent on them, obey all their rules, look the way they wanted me to, cower before them, and be pleasing to them.

This was bullshit. I didn’t need that so-called love. I was a living, mortal, fragile, complex sentient being, and that was fine. I could make my own decisions. I could think for myself. I had my own voice.
There are many more rather kickass quotes in the book. I really enjoyed it and parts of it resonated with me and would likely resonate with others going through the tough voyage of de-conversion.

You can get it in pretty much any E-reader format worth its salt. You can also get good old paper as well. Visit logospilgrim's bookstore  for more information!

Friday, 12 June 2015

"Does God Exist?" - Response The Final

Awhile back, I was challenged to a blogging debate by a Christian blogger, Anthony Freeland, who writes over at Truth Interrupted (which is not anything like Girl Interrupted). This last response will conclude the debate and then we'll all have a vote to see who won -- no wait, it seems like no Christians showed up on any of the comments threads, so maybe a vote wouldn't be nice.

Theist: Debate – “Does God Exist?” Opening statements for theism

Atheist: "Does God Exist?" - Response One

Theist: Debate: Does God Exist? Response 1 For Theism

And now without further ado, my response, which will more or less address the convenient points Tony laid out in his response.

Sean’s First Problem

I've got problems, but this one isn't one at all.

My alleged issue has to do with the burden of proof. Tony is arguing that a god exists and so, naturally, it is up to him to offer evidence for this. I may then ask for clarification, advance inconsistencies or question how conclusions are reached. It's highly likely this is not how things work in debates, though -- which is sad.
I have made a claim, so I have no problem with that. The problem is that he seems to think that he has no responsibility in this regard. It’s true that I initiated this debate but once he accepted and we got under way that became irrelevant. The proposition is in the form of a question: “Does God Exist?” The proposition therefore places an equal burden of proof on both parties. Let me explain why this is important.
Why, precisely, is there an equal burden of proof on both sides? Is this the case for any other question? Must I prove the non-existence of unicorns or space aliens? Nonetheless, this God fellow seems special, so we could have a separate conversation about evidence for his non existence.
I have given two arguments for the existence of God. There are more, plenty more. If Sean were to tear down both of my arguments, does that mean that it’s more reasonable to believe that God does not exist? Of course not.
Yes, there are apparently many. Must I then sit and tear down every argument for the existence of a god ever to have been proposed before we can conclude there is insufficient evidence to believe in a god? Is there any other assertion like this? Must I go through every Illuminati or space alien conspiracy ever posited before being justified in my non-belief?

There really do seem to be a lot of arguments for the existence of a god. I wonder why so many seem to be necessary.
If he wants to make a case for atheism, which is necessary if we should deny that God exists, then he would have to not only tear down my arguments but also erect a case for thinking that atheism is more plausible than theism.
I need not make a case for atheism. It is the duty of the theist to make their case and if it is sound and convincing -- backed up by some evidence -- then the atheist will be convinced. It is like this for any assertion.

Sean’s Second Problem

The term begins to exist sounds a little odd. It's probably because while attempting to prove a God, the theist will often posit that all things have a cause. To which the atheist will often ask, what caused God?

To get around this, some theists seem to have separated all things into two classes; those which began to exist and those that have never began to exist. Something which never began to exist? It seems as if there is only one thing which the theist believes has never began to exist -- the prime mover ('pssst:  God'). It's a very convenient piece of begging the question.

1. Everything that begins to exist has a cause.

We don't know if everything either began to exist or was caused. This is certainly true with tables and chairs and planets and stars -- as far as we know...

2. The Universe began to exist.

... but we just don't know for sure about the universe -- by which Tony seems to mean everything. Apparently, quantum physics and cosmology has a rather wide variety of views on this, although I am not an expert. Although our universe does seem to have begun at one time, it's unclear what precisely started it into motion.

3. Therefore, the Universe had a cause.

Probably so. Even if it was a quantum fluctuation of something which was already there. I simply fail to see how this point to a god or the Christian god. If anything it points to something causing other things. Perhaps there was some initial cause, maybe it was another universe, maybe an infinite number of universes -- we don't know.

“We Don’t Know”

Philosophy is admiral. I've read some Plato, Plotinus, Aristotle -- upon which Christianity seems to be based to a great deal. It can be very poetic and nice, but the universe has demonstrated to us over and over again that it does not fit nicely into our philosophical plans.

Mr Craig and the other theologians are perfectly welcome to examine the evidence and come to the conclusion that it backs up their theology. Until the scientific consensus agrees, I'll stick with I don't know.

The Rebuttals

This has already gone on for awhile and I, unfortunately, am very pressed for time. I'll try to get some responses out in rapid fire, but welcome further discussion.

I. Could Tony please explain how something which is immaterial and non-physical be intelligent and have agency?

II. We know about integers. These are numbers which are, in themselves, finite but which extend out infinitely. Floating point (decimal) numbers are similar --- they are infinitely divisible. Fractals go on forever (as far as we know). I believe it is much more plausible to believe in an infinite collection of finite events than a single starter event which doesn't follow any of the rules of which we're aware.

Tony is attempting to answer a great mystery with an even bigger mystery. He's asking us to believe in something which is immaterial and intelligent, outside of time which has apparently done something before our time existed... forever, I guess. It tells us nothing at all.

Furthermore, if space can be infinite at least within our perceptible dimensions when why not space-time? I guess we just don't know.

III. As to power, I was being sincere. By what mechanism does this immaterial god affect change in our world. Is it magick?

IV. I would be interested to know what the attributes are, then, of this god and how we may test them. If Tony could enumerate them, it would be fantastic.
V. It is a very interesting article that he referenced but is irrelevant. Just because the Irish were wrong, it does not follow that nothing in the world, nothing in the Universe, or the Universe itself could possibly be designed. This is call the Composition Fallacy. That is, that what is true of a part must then be true of the whole itself.
Sort of reminds me of stating that everything which begin to exist had a cause and that the entire universe must behave in the precise same way.

VI. Finally:
Claiming agnosticism in a debate doesn’t work. Stating that “we don’t know” in a debate in which you are trying to show that one position is more plausible than another is nothing less than conceding, because if we don’t know that it’s true, then if follows necessarily that we don’t know that it’s not true.
I wasn't trying to show the atheist position is more plausible than the theist position because a-theism is a lack of a theistic belief. We don't know is shorthand for saying that there is simply insufficient evidence for a premise to be credible. There is insufficient evidence for a god and so, atheism is the more reasonable stance.

If I were trying to prove another god -- say the Allah of the Muslims -- this would be a different debate entirely.

VII. As for the Moral Argument, I would be happy to discuss it in future. It's just that by the time I get to this portion of the debate, I've already written too much.

Here's what I would like to challenge Tony to. I would like to have a discussion with him about any single point of contention in this debate. We could drill down into it.

I would be open to doing this over Skype or Google Hangouts for a set amount of time -- say no more than 60 minutes per topic.

I think that could be very interesting.

PS: I apologize that I wasn't able to go further into this. Truly, Tony has done an amazing job of exploring every point and I'm simply unable to respond to everything. I have been stuck looking after my five year old son and it's been rather difficult to concentrate. During discussion, I promise to go much deeper into any of the many topics.

Search This Blog