Author: Pamelia Taylor

Benefits of 프리미어중계 for Politicians

Benefits of 프리미어중계 for Politicians

The sports industry is not an industry in the strict sense of the word, but a so-called cross-sectional industry. People from all over the world watch sport 프리미어중계 from time to time.

Politicians and 프리미어중계: Sport is important for the heart, circulation and metabolism

Every form of movement ensures that the heart is challenged more. The heart pumps faster, the blood vessel’s pressure increases and they expand. The danger of blood clots in the narrow vessels decreases. Despite the higher stress, the blood pressure drops because the blood can be pumped through the veins more easily and the heart has to work against less resistance.

Regular exercise strengthens and strengthens the heart muscles. And a trained heart can pump more blood into the body with every beat, work more efficiently and improve blood circulation. Even for the smallest vessels, sport is important, because with the movement they are better supplied with blood and oxygen in all body regions. Damage in the blood vessels can even regress through regular physical activity.

In short, sport is important for all vital processes in the body of politicians.

Politicians and 프리미어중: Sports Strengthen bones and muscles through exercise

프리미어중계

Bones have the ability to adapt to changing mechanical requirements. Your bones build up and become stronger when you are stressed. If, on the other hand, they are not exposed to or only slightly exposed to stress, they can even regress. Exercise strengthens the bone density accordingly.

Sport is particularly important for women because statistically, they are more likely to develop osteoporosis than men. Too little activity also causes the cartilage and therefore the joints to receive too few nutrients and thus becoming dry, brittle and cracked. Cartilage is “nourished” with synovial fluid. This is used for the synovial fluid and ensures that the smooth cartilage coating is not damaged. This grease is “massaged” into the cartilage through stress and relief, for example through sport. If there is a lack of exercise or an incorrect load, there is an undersupply and the joint becomes susceptible to damage.

Healthcare Forces Politicians to Make Decisions

Healthcare Forces Politicians to Make Decisions

The Action Committee needs politicians to make clear healthcare decisions. More than twenty influential healthcare administrators, scientists, and general practitioners have supported the Ten-Point Plan.

Political parties do not promise mountains of gold during the election campaigns and afterward ‘behave like skimpy guys’ while in government and parliament. Politicians must clearly state what they want to spend the money on before the elections, whether it is technology, home treatment, modern chemotherapy, according to the Action Committee’s Manifesto ‘Together Courageous for Healthcare.‘ According to the ‘brave doctors,’ who previously ran a successful campaign to reduce unnecessary bureaucracy, it all involves making responsible decisions that make care accessible and manageable.

100 percent solidarity in healthcare

The action committee challenges the politicians to express their opinion on four concrete choices. The first is the choice for one hundred percent solidarity with the vulnerable residents. ‘The dogma of’ self-management ‘is no excuse for not providing sufficient care to these vulnerable people,’ the manifesto said. The doctors also want care to be a basic public provision, accessible to everyone and non-commercial. ‘As a political party, make clear what maximum health care costs can be for citizens, an average family already pays a quarter of its income in health insurance premiums. Show courage and indicate in concrete terms what can and cannot be paid for from public funds, ‘the doctors write.

Optimal care and trust

Doctors want to get rid of the current incident policy and excess checks. ‘A never-ending stream of inspections alternates with the submission of ticked lists. Stop the organized mistrust and excessive need for control of the bureaucracy. ‘

The doctors want more confidence in the professionalism of healthcare providers. They must be given the space ‘to provide the most favorable care for that one unique patient’. Now, according to doctors, current production-oriented financing gives the wrong incentives to healthcare providers. ‘The endless checklists and a never-ending stream of inspections characterize political distrust and lead to defensive medicine and over-the-top protocols.

Overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and nonsensical care are harmful consequences for the patient. Remove these stimuli from the system and let the healthcare provider do what he can do best, practice his profession, and provide proper medication to patients regardless if they are just complaining of gut illness. Read The Swell Score about what this doctor used to resolve her gut issues and become healthier.

Invest in professionalism and training, instead of more control and patronizing. ‘

Radical smoking prevention

The radical approach to smoking advocated by the action committee is striking. and doctors believe that this is the best preventive measure that contributes to the health of the citizens. They point out that every year 20,000 people in other countries die from the consequences of smoking, because politicians do not dare to take drastic measures. “Is your party willing to raise cigarette prices, drastically reduce the number of outlets and ban smoking from the public domain?”

Why Is It Important For Women To Participate In Politics?

Why Is It Important For Women To Participate In Politics?

In 1918, Suze Groeneweg was the first woman to enter the House of Representatives. More than a century later, women continue to be underrepresented in politics. What happened to cause that? What is the significance of having women in politics? And how do we encourage more women to run for political office?

Are you looking for towing services that will help you with your towing problems? visit ‘http://sanjosetowing.org/‘ for more details.

Why are there few women in Dutch politics?
Women have been underrepresented in Dutch politics for years. For example, the Netherlands has never had a female prime minister and the majority of the members of parliament are male. The representation of women is even lower in other political bodies, such as in municipal councils and water boards. The relatively low percentage of women in politics is partly due to stereotypes. As a result, we have certain expectations of women and men. For example, we still see a man more often as successful and as a leader. As a result, women are sometimes overlooked for positions where these qualities are important. Sexism and attention to the appearance of female politicians are also a deterrent. And in most cases, it is still the woman who works less after the birth of a child. Of all EU countries, women in the Netherlands work the fewest hours and the difference between women and men is nowhere as great as in our country. Because of this image, women also consider themselves less suitable and if they do, it is less common and socially accepted to say so. Until they are fifteen boys and girls still have the same ambition to enter politics, but after that, a difference arises.

What good is it if there are more women in politics?
More equal gender distribution in politics means a better representation of the population. It ensures that the topics covered represent a larger part of society. Of course, a man can also stand up for women’s rights and that also happens regularly, but empathizing with yourself becomes more difficult the more you differ from each other. Meanwhile, many women in politics are no longer necessarily engaged in promoting women’s rights, but they are taking their womanhood into the Chamber. We see this in the case of Kirsten van de Hul of the PvdA, who, through her personal experiences in a violent relationship, submits an initiative note in 2018 to increase safety. Diversity in our political governance has many positive effects. Cultural diversity in the workplace stimulates the economy, leads to more creativity and innovation, and has more satisfied employees. In addition, women in politics act as role models for women and girls in society. Chamber president Khadija Arib, for example, fulfills an important exemplary role. For women in general, but specifically for migrant women, who are even more under-represented in public functions.

How do we get more women in political positions?
Improving gender equality is primarily a function of political will and the dismantling of stereotypes. We can, for example, increase the number of women in politics by establishing quotas, organizing actions and campaigns, and providing training specifically for women. Voting for women is a simple way to increase the number of women in political office. This occurs frequently: women receive more preferential votes than men. But not nearly enough to ensure a balanced distribution. As a result, the Vote for a Woman initiative encourages voters to vote for a woman who may or may not be elected, so that she can still be elected to the House of Representatives or the municipal council through preferential voting.

Biodiversity is the Government’s Responsibility

Biodiversity is the Government’s Responsibility

Biodiversity is under enormous pressure, but politics has different priorities. There is no realization that, with the extinction of all types of insects, birds and other animals, our own habitats will disappear as well. This is an imminent challenge that demands a serious political change of direction.

In 1958, as part of the Great Leap Forward program, Mao Zedong called on the people to slaughter and send the sparrows out. After all, these “capitalist animals” will consume an immense amount of food. Mass devastation has been a great achievement. Two years later, the country experienced a major migrating locust epidemic that resulted in many crop failures. In addition to drought, poor weather, erosion and the misuse of poisons and pesticides, the Great Chinese Famine destroyed millions of people.

This tragic chapter in the modern history of China is a warning. It warns against ignoring the relevance of nature to our human existence. If we do not take the value of biodiversity very seriously in this intensive agricultural region, we will face unexpected consequences.

Also in this region, the sparrow, once the most common bird species in the Netherlands, has now landed on the Red List of Bird Protection. It is correct that no birds’ nests are plundered here in order to permanently kill the animals, but our petrified living environment and the use of toxic agents are definitely not an invitation to the resident chirping garden.

Of course, it’s not just about the sparrow. Far too many birds, mammals, amphibians and plants are in rapid decline. The numbers are out and should shock not just nature lovers, but any right-minded citizen of this world.

Nitrogen Approach Program

The new government should not make it a secret that it has other goals, such as strengthening the economic environment for multinationals. It does not matter if these commercial practices are at the detriment of the environment, ecology or nature in general, as long as the chimney smokes and profits rise. The Nitrogen Approach Program, recently condemned by the European Court of Justice, is typical: agricultural scaling up in the guise of nitrogen reduction.

Knowing that the greenest government ever shouts out more than it does, scientific associations, nature federations and the agro-chain itself have joined forces.

Agricultural vision

It was a matter of politics. We support the fact that both the VVD and the CDA have put nature – including growth and urban greening – on the agenda. We also expect to look at Minister Carola Schouten’s new agricultural vision, which advocates circular agriculture without strong pesticides and fertilizers, but does embrace organic pesticides such as ‘organic pest control’ and also natural fertilizers it is safe because it doesn’t contain dangerous chemicals that can harm the nature . It should be remembered that there is no focus on optimizing natural values.

The conservation and improvement of biodiversity in the Netherlands cannot rely exclusively on the willingness of a few nature organizations and initiatives. Serious politically supported intervention is required. Then politics would dare to give priority to a nature-including and balanced economy, or the sparrow will have flown for good!

 

Does Visiting Entertainment Talk Shows Make Any Sense for Politicians?

Does Visiting Entertainment Talk Shows Make Any Sense for Politicians?

Less than ten days remain and the polls are over. Too bad for us scholars in this political spectacle, but hopefully a relief to those who don’t find all that fascinating. After all, you’ve come across politicians all over the place, even when you don’t anticipate it. Visiting talk shows has become a regular weapon in the political campaign toolbox. The concern, however, is what impact this has on the reputation of particular politicians as well as on the trust of politicians more generally.

Talk shows and presentations by politicians

To answer this question, we must first look at the content of such programs. Not surprisingly, the interviewers in entertainment talk shows are much less critical of their guests than the interviewers in journalistic programs.

The reason for this is twofold are:

  • the goal that the producers have in mind
  • the topics that a program normally focuses on.

To begin with the first talk show, hosts of mostly television shows want to amuse their viewers. While some suspense is often exciting, the feel-good content of these shows is paramount. The result is that-compared to interviews in journalistic programs-politicians are addressed in a more polite and constructive manner, are often less distracted, and instead are allowed to continue chatting with sounds like “umm,” “real?” or “yeah, I understand.” “But interviews with reporters are in most cases characterized by a sensitive questioning style which is often described as a ceremonial sword combat”

In addition, the issues discussed in such interventions are essential for the understanding of the effect. Interviews of news and current affairs programming tend to concentrate on political ideas or controversies, and politicians are dismissive of their previous work or aspirations for the future. Yet celebrity chat shows present a totally different side of politicians.

Watch “Using your voice is a political choice”

https://youtu.be/zaZBgqfEa1E

Talk shows and the effects on public opinion

The concern is whether the time and resources that lawmakers bring into talk shows will pay off with extra votes. This has been investigated in the context of the US and Japanese elections. In the 2000 elections of Bush and Gore, these presidential candidates were repeatedly portrayed on talk shows such as Oprah Winfrey’s. Survey analysis suggests that viewing chat shows may have an impact on how nice people find politicians, but it also increases the chance of voting for them. People who identify with the Democratic Party were more likely to vote for Bush if they were to see these shows more frequently, while Republicans were more sympathetic and more likely to vote for Gore. Talk shows were therefore able to narrow the partisan divide in that election and persuade the voters to change parties. An significant nuance, though, is that only voters with very little political experience and participation have been affected. The opportunity to vote for a politician from the other side did not improve for people who were more politically active.

  1. Presentation of politicians in entertainment chat shows is much more constructive than in journalistic programmers. This could lead to more elections on the lawmakers who take the trouble to participate in those programs. There are, however, a host of remarks to be made: These favorable results are observed only for individuals with very little political experience.
  2.  Positive results have only been reached if the entertaining message often contains political components.
  3.  It can also contribute to political distrust among people with great political knowledge.

Talk Shows are like ‘iptv’, intended to resolve problems or raise consciousness, provide data or entertain people.

Through The Grapevine… Social Media and its reach with Elections

Through The Grapevine… Social Media and its reach with Elections

As sociologists assure, users of social networks adhere to views atypical for the rest of the electorate. This is confirmed by the analysis of the results of monitoring by Google during the election campaign, when the mentions of the elections in the news were measured. A fairly large proportion of voters who use the Internet do not follow politicians on social networks, but prefer to receive information from the media.

The number of fans in new media is another reason for the pride of politicians. However, as experience shows, it does not have significant results on the voting results. Like a candidate’s page does not always mean willingness to vote for him.

For example, in the 2010 Senate elections, Democratic leader Harry Reid defeated the representative of the conservative Tea Party Sherron Angle. Despite the fact that at the time of the vote, Angle’s Facebook fans were 7 times more than Reed’s (104 thousand versus 14 thousand), she lost, losing only five percent of the vote.

The Internet and social media are like a gigantic exhibition

Each participant of which by any means tries to attract as many visitors as possible to his stand. However, research shows that people are more responsive when the message is addressed to them personally.

As part of the experiment, professors Alan Gerber and Donald Green (Alan Gerber, Donald Green) selected 30 thousand potential voters and campaigned them in person, by phone and by mail. According to the results of the study, it turned out that personal campaigning can significantly increase the voter turnout, while “impersonal” letters and calls did not have a significant impact on it. According to the conclusions of scientists, a certain part of the electorate does not vote at all, until it personally communicates with a representative of the candidate.

Eight years later, in order to further explore the issue, Gerber and his colleagues conducted an e-mail newsletter, in which they promised to make public information about whether the survey participants voted. After the mailing, the turnout rate increased by 8.1%. According to scientists, the experiment was based on one of the basic principles of social psychology, according to which most people strive to conform to social norms. Non-participation in elections seems to many to deviate from these norms.

The importance of personalized messages was also highlighted by a study by New York University professor Sinan Aral. He found that direct messages to friends on Facebook asking them to try out a particular app were 98% more effective than regular posts with the same content broadcast to the news feed and with test hodelykter you can view it while camping.

Scientists note that young people who spend a lot of time on the Internet are least interested in voting. They are much more interested in social activities – protests, boycotts, participation in trials as a jury.

The potential of the Internet audience of a particular candidate does not so much depend on the number

As on what powers the followers of a politician are endowed with. An extensive “fan base” on social networks can be useful for creating a buzz around a candidate’s personality, fans can coordinate their offline support actions on the Internet , put forward proposals for an election program. However, it should be remembered that virtual support does not always translate into real voices.

Influence of Art in Politics

Influence of Art in Politics

Art and politics

Art is autonomous. This means that it operates independently of those in power. Still, it needs the government for its survival. The Dutch government supports art financially, and thereby partly determines which art deserves this support. But also regardless of the financial aspect, the question is whether art and politics are really so separate from each other.

The vision of politics on art
At the end of the 18th century, the philosopher Emanuel Kant formulated the purpose of art as ‘l’art pour l’art’. This phrase that has become famous means that art need not have any other purpose than to be art. In other words; it is not about the message but about the artistic value of the artwork.

Even nowadays, political parties still propagate that the value of art is not in the message they proclaim. So what is the value of art? Some slogans:

  • Culture inspires, connects, and makes you think, which makes it of great value to society.
  • Because a flourishing, diverse, and high-quality art supply can make a significant contribution to social welfare, a substantial state share in the financing of art is justifiable.
  • To be able to connect and distinguish art, culture, and heritage. They help society to constantly reflect on itself.

Political direction
Politics is not only largely responsible for financing art. Politics also determines (to a considerable extent) the way in which people think about art – and the hardening of it. A term like ‘left-wing hobby’ will sound familiar to everyone these days. The political debate is part of the public debate. For example with a statement such as:
“The Residentie Orchestra is a trombone club that does not deserve a penny in subsidy”.

Major cultural cuts have been made since 2011. Cultural institutions are expected to be more financially independent and to listen more to the wishes of the general public. This theme broadcast of 1 Today examines the question of the effect of these cutbacks on art institutions.

Art as political propaganda
Art needs politics. Politics is important in the support base and provides facilitation and financing. But politics also needs art. In fact, in his essay ‘Post-propaganda’, artist Jonas Staal explains how even in the Netherlands the artist propagates the political system.

Art, he writes, makes power recognizable. As a historical example, he cites how filmmaker Leni Riefenstahl helped to give the Nazi regime a clear, recognizable face.

In the Netherlands, there is no dictatorial regime and officially there is no propaganda. But Staal emphasizes that there is also a form of propaganda in Western freedom. Art propagates freedom.

Art as a messenger of freedom
In the words of philosopher Kant, art has been given the freedom to, in popular terms, do whatever it pleases. Without having to justify itself and without having to convey a political or moral message.

How Far Will We Go To Fight The Lives Of Our Seniors During The Pandemic?

How Far Will We Go To Fight The Lives Of Our Seniors During The Pandemic?

This pandemic affected the lives of many people especially the elderly.

Many people around the world cannot feel at ease if an older adult in their family is sick of COVID.  They are watching closely on nay developments when it comes to cure.  We become very concern because the chances of an elderly dying are high if they contract the virus. They know for a fact that ones an elderly contracts the virus they may have no choice but to leave them to die. This is often the case because many people around the world don’t have the resources to save a life.
 
Statistics show that deaths among people aged 65 and older are  highest. During the pandemic many of these deaths have taken placed in facilities. A number of deaths took place in  hospice care among the elderly.  The number is very disturbing and it’s a reality that few efforts are being done in many countries to stop this.
 
Some politicians kept their eyes close. They allowed nature take its course because they believe that saving a seniors life is not worth it. This virus is hard to eradicate and many nations don’t focus on saving a seniors life.  Many are left to die naturally because of the lack of resources. Our frontlines are exhausted in saving lives and they feel that this is the best option.
 
As humans it is just proper to give our elderly the utmost care they deserve. However this pandemic has caused so much fear.  We limit ourselves to care for elders with COVID because of the fear of contracting the virus. The lack of facility and cure also contributed to this. This restricted us to provide the utmost care our elderlies need to prolong their life.

Senior living facilities facing challenges during COVID-19 pandemic

 
Many nations cannot provide the necessary PPE’s to it’s front liners and patients. This are important to help protect against the virus.  Some nations also fail to provide funds for the needed equipment in hospitals.  Equipment such as adjustable beds are important for many elders who have COVID. But it’s a sad reality that many hospitals do not have this. These beds are important because they can help in promoting proper breathing. Governments around the world are facing this problem and are left unresolved. To read more about adjustable beds visit: 
https://bedroom.solutions/best-adjustable-beds/
 
But there is still good left in many of us, we still make it a point to save lives especially that of our elderlies. We strive and fight to let them stay alive. But it’s also sad to realize that despite these efforts  many nations mixed politics in our fight to COVID 19. They make things worst instead of making the situation lighter and brighter.
 
Some politicians think that its useless to put funds to elderlies who have the virus.  They think that it’s not worth it. They would rather save the younger age groups because they have more to do in the society. This is one notion we should correct. Everyone deserves to live especially our seniors.
Policies and River Guidelines for Staying Safe on the Water

Policies and River Guidelines for Staying Safe on the Water

Unlike rough road riders, paddlers do not need to have a ticket. But, they are still the master of their water vessel. Meaning, they are the one responsible for the kayak safety and all its passengers.

Paddlers are known as the ‘vessel master’ over the water.

Kayaks and boats do not have breaks to control the vessel. They are also going on a backward motion as well. So, avoid water collisions on the river must be taken with greater consideration. 

Different River Rules for Paddlers

To prevent any danger while in the water, here are some of the rules to be followed by paddlers.

Paddler’s Golden Rule

For paddlers, keep in mind that if you are confused, just stay clear. In case you want to give way on the water, better to make a move early. Also, make it obvious so that other vessels would know your intentions.

Paddler’s General Rule

Paddlers must have to stay on the right side of the river. Paddling on a busy area of the river will lead you closer to the shore.

Paddler’s Visibility Rules

This rule states that paddlers must have to carry a source of white lightning, like a torch or lantern, when paddling over a traversable water during sunset and sunrise. The lightning source must be available for use and shall be displayed on enough time to avoid water accidents.

Paddler’s Lifejacket Rules

It is the main responsibility of the paddlers to wear life jackets on the river. This rule implies that life jackets are required to be carried on the paddle craft especially when navigating 400 meters and above offshore in unprotected waters.

Furthermore, life jackets for childrens’ use is the primary responsibility of parents. Children below 10 years old are recommendable to wear life jackets at all times. This rule may be approved by the Citizens for Child Care.

Simple Tips on Staying Safe on the Water

  1. Always wear a life jacket. Opt for the one that fits you and suits your preference.
  2. Wear bright clothes or use fluorescent paint on the paddle. This may help to make the paddle craft visible to other boats.
  3. Stay connected. Do not allow yourself to be separated from the paddle once you capsize. You should use a paddle leash to make this happen. 
  4. Check over other vessels, swimmers, and possible water hazards often. There are best two person kayak available so that you will not be paddling alone.
  5. Familiarize yourself with the safe water operating rules before paddling in.
What Happened After the First Lady Tried to Make the White House Less Gaudy

What Happened After the First Lady Tried to Make the White House Less Gaudy

After moving in the White House, The US President promptly began working on something (presumably) very important for him he got rid of a few of those West Wing décor chosen by the Obamas and included a whole lot of golden into the location. Nonetheless, it ends up the President eliminate a lot of fine, modern furniture pieces his wife, Melania, chose out too.

Melania did proceed following her husband’s inauguration because you remember; before their kid ended the college year rather, she remained in NYC for a couple of months. Subsequently, she led to Washington. However, prior to the First Lady eventually moved to her new (indescribable) house, she strove to assist decorate the location. Per the New York Times:

The President’s wife, a former fashion model who favors clean, contemporary lines, had picked some furniture to the White House house from the months until she entered her husband from Washington. Nevertheless, with bits that he liked, her decisions were — substituted by the President — whose tastes veer toward the triumphal design of Louis XIV in her absence.

Even the Times notes a person “comfortable” with the problem said that it was only “an illustration of the President’s inclination to not relent on the tiniest requests from his spouse.” Meanwhile, Melania’s spokeswoman advised that the Times the furniture replacement has been completed by the president and Melania. “They chose the décor,” she explained.

Unusual that anybody would not jump at the opportunity to distance themselves in Trump’s tacky golden interior-design flavor.

The First Lady only has a staff of 10 people, that will be very low in comparison to 25 who worked for the former First Ladies before her. She has hit a few snags, including the simple fact that her policy manager, Reagan Hedlund, abandoned the White House earlier this season, also she has yet to have yourself a great East Wing initiative off the ground.